Main Menu

Home

ABRAHAM'S REPORT

Mission & Goals

Priorities

Offensive email

2009 MCAS Scores

School Budget

Burton's '04 Eval and why it still matters

Declining Enrollment Myth

Student/Admin Ratio

SUPERINTENDENT SEARCH

The Dark Side

The Reconfiguration

----------

Links

FAQ

Events & News

NEWS


Special Town Meeting

Superintendent Search Survey Results

Wayland Audit site

2010 ranking by Boston.com

2010 MCAS scores now available

New Loker Principal

Business Administrator Joy Buhler's replacement

The Case for Electronic Voting

----------

Comments & Suggestions

----------

Town-side Pages

Click here for pages more related to the town than the schools

Special Town Meeting • 11.17.11 • 7:30pm • Middle School

Elevator Version ~ Why Should I Care? ~ Letters & Links
Details ~ Frequently Asked Questions

Why Should I Care?

There are a number of reasons:

• The fact that residents discovered this situation, rather than our town officials is disturbing. It suggests that our elected and appointed officials either did not understand what was happening or that they did, yet said nothing. Either case is cause for concern.

• To maintain a reserve of $10.3 million in Free Cash while the state's maximum recommendation is $3.5 million and FinCom's own guidelines specify $3.5 - $7 million, indicates that we've overpaid our taxes. Every dollar over a fiscally responsible reserve (cushion) should be applied to provide tax relief. The only way to ensure this happens is to support the passage of Article 3.

• In an "I could have had a V-8" moment, the Board of Selectmen promptly introduced their own article, but only after the petitioners submitted their article. The Selectmen's plan was to introduce an article that would limit the amount of Free Cash appropriated for tax relief to only $1 million dollars.

• If Article 3 does not pass, the surplus will sit in the Free Cash reserve fund and continue to grow, while each of us will be required to pay an average of $1,000 more in taxes this year than necessary.

• It's interesting to note that from a board that frequently votes unanimously, the FinCom vote was only 4-3 in favor of the Selctmen's article (#4) and that one FinCom member broke ranks and voted in favor or the petitioners Article 3.